Этот коммит содержится в:
Aj Fontana 2022-11-24 09:24:07 -08:00
родитель f067b68d04
Коммит 9680703168

Просмотреть файл

@ -41,4 +41,56 @@
- [An Introduction to Evidence Based Medicine](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P-G2veeYC1Q)
- [How to Appraise a Clinical Trial - Part 1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmbxnnjfnGs&t=1s)
- [How to Appraise a Clinical Trial - Part 2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mjoxnQ-DpBI)
- [How to Appraise a Clinical Trial - Part 3](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPTm9amQgEE)
- [How to Appraise a Clinical Trial - Part 3](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OPTm9amQgEE)
## People
1. [Ronald J Allen](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Ronald-J-Allen-80823481)
- [Relative plausibility and its critics](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1365712718813781)
- [Evidence Probability and the Burden of Proof](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2245304)
- [Burdens of Proof](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2146184)
- [Mathematical Models of Evidence](https://philpapers.org/rec/ALLTPV)
- [The Common Law Theory of Experts: Deference or Education?](https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/934/)
- [New Directions for Evidence Science](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEwfk9U0Bbc)
- [Ronald J. Allen, Evidence Theory or Science? Legal Epistemology Meets its Parents and Isnt Pleased](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ1-n24r70U)
- [Standards of proof and the limits of legal analysis](https://philpapers.org/rec/ALLSOP)
2. [Andres Paez](https://philpeople.org/profiles/andres-paez/publications?app=320&order=added)
- [Evidential Reasoning and Cognitive Bias](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhqtVYjUZaU)
- [Probability-lowering causes and the connotations of causation](https://philpapers.org/rec/PEZPCA)
- [The prediction of future behavior: The empty promises of expert clinical and actuarial testimony](https://philpapers.org/rec/PEZTPO-2)
- [Explanation, Understanding, and Belief Revision](https://www.academia.edu/37887976/Explanation_Understanding_and_Belief_Revision)
- [An Epistemological Analysis of the Use of Reputation as Evidence](https://philarchive.org/rec/PEZAEA)
- [Andrés Páez: Deciding whom to believe; testimony as evidence.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfcAqdVJO0k)
3. [Susan Haack](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Haack)
- [Foundherentism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundherentism)
4. [William Twining](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Twining)
- [William Twining: The Man Who Radicalized the Middle Ground](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3769135)
5. [Michael S Moore](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Michael-S-Moore-2057632175)
- [Moore on Causation and Responsibility: Metaphysics or Intuition?](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2489256)
- [Michael S. Moore, Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259709058_Michael_S_Moore_Causation_and_Responsibility_An_Essay_in_Law_Morals_and_Metaphysics)
- [Legal_Responsibility_and_Scalar_Causation](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328838995_Legal_Responsibility_and_Scalar_Causation)
- [INTRODUCTION: THE NATURE OF SINGULARIST THEORIES OF CAUSATION](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298514473_INTRODUCTION_THE_NATURE_OF_SINGULARIST_THEORIES_OF_CAUSATION)
6. [John_Henry_Wigmore](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Henry_Wigmore)
7. [David A Schum](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/David-A-Schum-2108621468)
8. [Richard Posner](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Posner)
9. [Jennifer Mnookin](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=_yf8ST0AAAAJ&hl=en)
- [Of Black boxes, instruments, and experts: Testing the validity of forensic science](https://philpapers.org/rec/MNOOBB)
- [Jennifer L. Mnookin: The ongoing epistemic challenges of forensic science as legal evidence.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQJerKzZsRc)
- [Is Some Forensic Science "Junk" Science? Jennifer Mnookin Interview With Malcolm Fleschner](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBgW4jzcDis)
- [The Uncertain Future of Forensic Science](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3300354)
10. [Jane Stapleton](https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/stapleton-bj)
- [Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences](https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol54/iss3/11/)
- [Review: Law, Causation and Common Sense](https://www.jstor.org/stable/764415)
- [Unnecessary Cause](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2276779)
11. [Paolo-Garbolino](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paolo-Garbolino)
- [Evaluation of Scientific Evidence Using Baysian Networks](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11454051_Evaluation_of_Scientific_Evidence_Using_Baysian_Networks)
- [Explaining Relevance](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_9)
- [The Scientification of Forensic Practice](https://philpapers.org/rec/GARTSO-15)
- [Historical Narratives, Evidence, and Explanations](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_20)
- [The Bayes factor: the coherent measure for hypothesis confirmation](https://academic.oup.com/lpr/article/20/1/15/6485211)
- [Coherently updating degrees of belief: Radical Probabilism, the generalization of Bayes Theorem and its consequences on evidence evaluation](https://academic.oup.com/lpr/article/19/3-4/293/6269125)
- [Paolo Garbolino: Evidence and Probabilistic Explanations.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye-TU6QRbPY)
12. [Barbara Osimani](https://philpeople.org/profiles/barbara-osimani)
- [Hunting Side Effects and Explaining Them: Should We Reverse Evidence Hierarchies Upside Down?](https://philpapers.org/rec/OSIHSE-2)
- [Until RCT proven? On the asymmetry of evidence requirements for risk assessment](https://philpapers.org/rec/OSIURO)
- [Barbara Osimani: Statistical Evidence in Strategic Environments](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_NyFTYSEh8)