# Evidence and Proof ## [Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Evidence) & [Skepticism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Skepticism) - [BJM Evidence Based Medicine](https://ebm.bmj.com/) 1. [Burden of Proof](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)) 2. [Assertion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_act) 3. [Evidence in Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Evidence_law) 4. [Burden of Proof in Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law)) 5. [Jurisprudence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justification_(jurisprudence)) 6. [Legal Concept of Evidence](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence-legal/) 7. [Scientific Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence) 8. [Theories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Theories) 9. [Hypotheses](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hypotheses) 10. [Doubt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Doubt) 11. [Fact](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact) 12. [Statements](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Statements) 13. [Truth](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Truth) 14. [Belief_revision](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief_revision) 15. [Justification](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Justification_(epistemology)) 16. [Cherry Picking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking) 17. [Belief Perserverance](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief_perseverance) 18. [Counterargument](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterargument) 19. [Sources of Knowledge](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sources_of_knowledge) 20. [Epistemic Closure](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemic_closure) 21. [Philosophy of Evidence](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence/) 22. [Evidence](https://iep.utm.edu/evidence/) 23. [Evidence Based Practices](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Evidence-based_practices) 24. [Evidence Based Policy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence-based_policy) 25. [Documentary_evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_evidence) 26. [Eyewitness_testimony](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitness_testimony) 27. [Eyewitnesses](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Eyewitness) 28. [Testimony](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Testimony) 29. [Forensic Science](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_science) 30. [United_States_evidence_law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_evidence_law) * [Federal Rules of Evidence](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre) * [Preponderance of Evidence](https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/preponderance_of_the_evidence) * [Evidence Lectures](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrHocdJpGBy3ej0nEDUwvzW8QdHmag0gy) * [Evidence Crash Course](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0JgU9zLKXAEDXuidYyqkWIDqklGUcTbc) * [The Federal Rules of Evidence - Part 1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzPiwaLMTi4&t=738s) * [The Federal Rules of Evidence - Part 2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kobwQoPC-9k&t=2s) * [The Federal Rules of Evidence - Part 3](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IB74lXTQuI&t=7s) 31. [Hierarchy_of_evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_evidence) 32. [Proof](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_(truth)) 33. [Disconfirming Evidence](http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Rowlands/Disconfirming_Evidence.shtml) 34. [Validity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Validity_(statistics)) 35. [Hearsay](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay) 36. [Trace Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trace_evidence) 37. [Confirmation Bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias) 38. [Demonstrative Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonstrative_evidence) 39. [Coraborating Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corroborating_evidence) 40. [Character Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_evidence) 41. [Circumstantial Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumstantial_evidence) 42. [Transient Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transient_evidence) 43. [Anecdotal_evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence) 44. [Admissable Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admissible_evidence) 45. [Evidence_of_absence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence) [Discussion](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mnS2WYLCGJP2kQkRn/absence-of-evidence-is-evidence-of-absence) 46. [Survivorship_bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias) 47. [Memory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Memory) 48. [Priming](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priming_(psychology)) ## People 1. [Ronald J Allen](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Ronald-J-Allen-80823481) - [Relative plausibility and its critics](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1365712718813781) - [Evidence Probability and the Burden of Proof](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2245304) - [Burdens of Proof](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2146184) - [Mathematical Models of Evidence](https://philpapers.org/rec/ALLTPV) - [The Common Law Theory of Experts: Deference or Education?](https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/934/) - [New Directions for Evidence Science](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEwfk9U0Bbc) - [Ronald J. Allen, Evidence Theory or Science? Legal Epistemology Meets its Parents and Isn’t Pleased](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ1-n24r70U) - [Standards of proof and the limits of legal analysis](https://philpapers.org/rec/ALLSOP) 2. [Andres Paez](https://philpeople.org/profiles/andres-paez/publications?app=320&order=added) - [Evidential Reasoning and Cognitive Bias](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhqtVYjUZaU) - [Probability-lowering causes and the connotations of causation](https://philpapers.org/rec/PEZPCA) - [The prediction of future behavior: The empty promises of expert clinical and actuarial testimony](https://philpapers.org/rec/PEZTPO-2) - [Explanation, Understanding, and Belief Revision](https://www.academia.edu/37887976/Explanation_Understanding_and_Belief_Revision) - [An Epistemological Analysis of the Use of Reputation as Evidence](https://philarchive.org/rec/PEZAEA) - [Andrés Páez: Deciding whom to believe; testimony as evidence.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfcAqdVJO0k) 3. [Susan Haack](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Haack) - [Foundherentism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundherentism) 4. [William Twining](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Twining) - [William Twining: The Man Who Radicalized the Middle Ground](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3769135) 5. [Michael S Moore](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Michael-S-Moore-2057632175) - [Moore on Causation and Responsibility: Metaphysics or Intuition?](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2489256) - [Michael S. Moore, Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259709058_Michael_S_Moore_Causation_and_Responsibility_An_Essay_in_Law_Morals_and_Metaphysics) - [Legal_Responsibility_and_Scalar_Causation](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328838995_Legal_Responsibility_and_Scalar_Causation) - [INTRODUCTION: THE NATURE OF SINGULARIST THEORIES OF CAUSATION](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298514473_INTRODUCTION_THE_NATURE_OF_SINGULARIST_THEORIES_OF_CAUSATION) 6. [John_Henry_Wigmore](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Henry_Wigmore) 7. [David A Schum](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/David-A-Schum-2108621468) 8. [Richard Posner](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Posner) 9. [Jennifer Mnookin](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=_yf8ST0AAAAJ&hl=en) - [Of Black boxes, instruments, and experts: Testing the validity of forensic science](https://philpapers.org/rec/MNOOBB) - [Jennifer L. Mnookin: The ongoing epistemic challenges of forensic science as legal evidence.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQJerKzZsRc) - [Is Some Forensic Science "Junk" Science? Jennifer Mnookin Interview With Malcolm Fleschner](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBgW4jzcDis) - [The Uncertain Future of Forensic Science](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3300354) 10. [Jane Stapleton](https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/stapleton-bj) - [Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences](https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol54/iss3/11/) - [Review: Law, Causation and Common Sense](https://www.jstor.org/stable/764415) - [Unnecessary Cause](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2276779) 11. [Paolo-Garbolino](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paolo-Garbolino) - [Evaluation of Scientific Evidence Using Baysian Networks](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11454051_Evaluation_of_Scientific_Evidence_Using_Baysian_Networks) - [Explaining Relevance](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_9) - [The Scientification of Forensic Practice](https://philpapers.org/rec/GARTSO-15) - [Historical Narratives, Evidence, and Explanations](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_20) - [The Bayes’ factor: the coherent measure for hypothesis confirmation](https://academic.oup.com/lpr/article/20/1/15/6485211) - [Coherently updating degrees of belief: Radical Probabilism, the generalization of Bayes’ Theorem and its consequences on evidence evaluation](https://academic.oup.com/lpr/article/19/3-4/293/6269125) - [Paolo Garbolino: Evidence and Probabilistic Explanations.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye-TU6QRbPY) 12. [Barbara Osimani](https://philpeople.org/profiles/barbara-osimani) - [Hunting Side Effects and Explaining Them: Should We Reverse Evidence Hierarchies Upside Down?](https://philpapers.org/rec/OSIHSE-2) - [Until RCT proven? On the asymmetry of evidence requirements for risk assessment](https://philpapers.org/rec/OSIURO) - [Barbara Osimani: Statistical Evidence in Strategic Environments](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_NyFTYSEh8) 13. [Michael S Pardo](https://scholar.google.com.sg/citations?user=Idq6eFAAAAAJ&hl=th) - [A Comment on Statistical Evidence and Standards of Proof](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3364351) - [Second Order Proof Rules](http://www.floridalawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Pardo_BOOK.pdf) - [Group Agency and Legal Proof; or, Why the Jury Is an “It"](https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol56/iss5/4/) 14. [Marina Gascón Abellán](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marina-Gascon-Abellan) - [Marina Gascón: Scientific proof. A map of challenges.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9ngtB3x0Ao) 15. [Susan Haack: Proof, probability and Statistics: The Problem of "Delusive Exactness".](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBPbTKlIU8I) 16. [Susan Haack: Causation & Correlation: The Bradford Hill 'Criteria' in Epistemologial Context.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aA434dzgAI)