зеркало из
https://github.com/SJKaczmarek/cybersec.git
synced 2025-10-29 05:04:19 +02:00
Update projects.md
Этот коммит содержится в:
родитель
b5747dfa6c
Коммит
3ef8a65ba6
@ -5,174 +5,214 @@ This portfolio is a public document and includes no sensitive or classified info
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview of Public Projects
|
||||
1. [Enterprise Network Security Audit](#project-1-enterprise-network-security-audit)
|
||||
2. [Small Business Security Enhancement](#project-2-small-business-security-enhancement)
|
||||
3. [Secure Satellite Communication](#project-3-secure-satellite-communication)
|
||||
4. [UAVs Security Framework](#project-4-uavs-security-framework)
|
||||
5. [AI-Driven Threat Detection](#project-5-ai-driven-threat-detection)
|
||||
6. [Secure Ground Amateur Antennas for Space Communication](#project-6-secure-ground-amateur-antennas-for-space-communication)
|
||||
7. [Lunar Analog Habitat Cybersecurity Protocol](#project-7-lunar-analog-habitat-cybersecurity-protocol)
|
||||
8. [Family Office Cybersecurity Solution](#project-8-family-office-cybersecurity-solution)
|
||||
2. [Small Business Security Assessment & Enhancement](#project-2-small-business-security-assessment--enhancement)
|
||||
3. [Secure Satellite Communication Protocol Design](#project-3-secure-satellite-communication-protocol-design)
|
||||
4. [UAV Cybersecurity Framework Implementation](#project-4-uav-cybersecurity-framework-implementation)
|
||||
5. [AI-Driven Network Anomaly Detection](#project-5-ai-driven-network-anomaly-detection)
|
||||
6. [Secure SDR Implementation for Amateur Ground Stations](#project-6-secure-sdr-implementation-for-amateur-ground-stations)
|
||||
7. [Lunar Analog Habitat Cybersecurity Architecture](#project-7-lunar-analog-habitat-cybersecurity-architecture)
|
||||
8. [Family Office Cybersecurity Framework](#project-8-family-office-cybersecurity-framework)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 1: Enterprise Network Security Audit
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
Conducted a thorough security audit for a large corporation, evaluating the current state of network structure, firewalls, IDS/IPS systems, and potential vulnerabilities.
|
||||
Conducted a comprehensive security audit for a large corporation, evaluating network architecture, firewall configurations, intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS), and overall vulnerability management posture.
|
||||
|
||||
### Objectives
|
||||
- Analyzed network topology and data flow.
|
||||
- Identified potential security risks and weak points.
|
||||
- Implemented secure file permissions using Linux commands.
|
||||
- Recommended necessary improvements and upgrades.
|
||||
- Analyzed network topology, segmentation, and data flow patterns for security risks.
|
||||
- Performed vulnerability scanning and configuration reviews of key network infrastructure.
|
||||
- Assessed firewall rule effectiveness and IDS/IPS signature relevance.
|
||||
- Recommended prioritized remediation actions and strategic security enhancements.
|
||||
- Evaluated system hardening practices, including Linux file permissions and database access controls.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools & Technologies
|
||||
- Firewalls (Cisco, Juniper)
|
||||
- Nessus, Wireshark
|
||||
- SQL, Linux
|
||||
- Network Vulnerability Scanner (Nessus)
|
||||
- Packet Analyzer (Wireshark)
|
||||
- Firewall Platforms (Cisco ASA, Juniper SRX)
|
||||
- Linux/*nix command-line utilities
|
||||
- SQL database query tools (for configuration review)
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome
|
||||
- Identified critical vulnerabilities and provided actionable insights.
|
||||
- Enhanced overall network security posture.
|
||||
- Increased awareness of compliance with regulations such as GDPR, HIPAA.
|
||||
- Identified numerous critical and high-severity vulnerabilities, providing detailed remediation guidance.
|
||||
- Delivered actionable insights leading to measurable improvements in the organization's network security posture.
|
||||
- Enhanced alignment with compliance requirements such as GDPR and HIPAA through targeted recommendations.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 2: Small Business Security Enhancement
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 2: Small Business Security Assessment & Enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
Performed a comprehensive security overhaul for a small business, focusing on identifying vulnerabilities and implementing robust security measures.
|
||||
Executed a comprehensive security assessment and implemented foundational security improvements for a small business, focusing on identifying critical vulnerabilities and establishing robust defensive measures.
|
||||
|
||||
### Objectives
|
||||
- Performed penetration testing using tools like Metasploit, Burp Suite.
|
||||
- Analyzed existing network structure and security protocols.
|
||||
- Coordinated incident response strategies.
|
||||
- Conducted external and internal penetration testing to identify exploitable vulnerabilities.
|
||||
- Analyzed existing network design, security policies, and access control mechanisms.
|
||||
- Developed and implemented baseline security configurations for workstations and servers.
|
||||
- Established incident response guidelines and provided staff awareness training.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools & Technologies
|
||||
- Metasploit, Burp Suite
|
||||
- Firewalls, IDS/IPS
|
||||
- Incident response coordination tools
|
||||
- Penetration Testing Frameworks (Metasploit, Burp Suite)
|
||||
- Network Firewalls (pfSense implementation)
|
||||
- Intrusion Detection System (Snort configuration)
|
||||
- Incident Response Ticketing System (setup and configuration)
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome
|
||||
- Strengthened the company’s defense against cyber threats.
|
||||
- Improved incident response time.
|
||||
- Fostered a culture of cybersecurity awareness within the organization.
|
||||
- Significantly strengthened defenses against common cyber threats like phishing and ransomware.
|
||||
- Reduced the potential attack surface through network segmentation and system hardening.
|
||||
- Improved the company's capability to detect and respond effectively to security incidents.
|
||||
- Fostered a more security-conscious culture within the organization.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 3: Secure Satellite Communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 3: Secure Satellite Communication Protocol Design
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
Led a project to ensure secure satellite communication for space missions, focusing on data integrity during space-to-Earth transmissions.
|
||||
Led the design and analysis of secure communication protocols for satellite command, telemetry, and payload data transmission, emphasizing confidentiality, integrity, and authentication for space-to-Earth links.
|
||||
|
||||
### Objectives
|
||||
- Implemented secure protocols for satellite communication.
|
||||
- Ensured integrity in space-to-Earth communications.
|
||||
- Conducted geospatial intelligence analysis.
|
||||
- Defined security requirements based on mission profile and threat modeling specific to space assets.
|
||||
- Designed cryptographic protocols incorporating AES-GCM and SHA-3, suitable for satellite operational constraints.
|
||||
- Implemented and validated secure data transmission mechanisms ensuring data integrity via authenticated encryption.
|
||||
- Analyzed protocol resilience against eavesdropping, replay attacks, and jamming scenarios.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools & Technologies
|
||||
- Geospatial Intelligence Analysis Tools (ArcGIS)
|
||||
- Encryption Technologies
|
||||
- Secure Data Transmission Protocols
|
||||
- Cryptographic Standards (AES-GCM, SHA-3, CCSDS Security Recommendations)
|
||||
- Protocol Simulation Environment (NS-3)
|
||||
- Secure Programming Libraries (OpenSSL)
|
||||
- Formal Verification Methods (preliminary analysis)
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome
|
||||
- Achieved secure and reliable communication for space missions.
|
||||
- Enhanced geospatial intelligence capabilities.
|
||||
- Paved the way for future advancements in secure space communication.
|
||||
- Developed robust protocol specifications enhancing confidentiality and integrity for critical satellite communications.
|
||||
- Validated protocol resilience against modeled space communication threats through simulation.
|
||||
- Contributed to establishing secure and reliable communication channels, increasing mission assurance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 4: UAVs Security Framework
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 4: UAV Cybersecurity Framework Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
Developed and implemented a security framework for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), protecting against potential cyber-attacks and unauthorized access.
|
||||
Developed and implemented a security framework for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), protecting command and control (C2) links, onboard data, and resisting potential cyber-attacks like jamming or hijacking.
|
||||
|
||||
### Objectives
|
||||
- Designed a secure communication channel between UAVs and control stations.
|
||||
- Conducted penetration testing on existing security protocols.
|
||||
- Implemented real-time monitoring and intrusion detection systems.
|
||||
- Secured the C2 link between UAVs and ground control stations using authenticated encryption (DTLS).
|
||||
- Implemented data-at-rest (LUKS) and data-in-transit (TLS) protection for collected sensor data.
|
||||
- Deployed lightweight intrusion detection agents tailored for UAV operational constraints.
|
||||
- Conducted penetration testing against the implemented framework using RF analysis tools.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools & Technologies
|
||||
- Encryption Technologies
|
||||
- IDS/IPS Systems
|
||||
- Penetration Testing Tools (Metasploit, Burp Suite)
|
||||
- Wireless Security Protocols (DTLS, WPA3-Enterprise)
|
||||
- Lightweight Cryptography Libraries (mbed TLS)
|
||||
- Embedded Linux Security Tools (iptables, auditd)
|
||||
- SDR Platforms (HackRF for RF testing)
|
||||
- Custom Intrusion Detection Agents
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome
|
||||
- Ensured robust security measures for UAV operations.
|
||||
- Reduced risk of cyber-attacks and unauthorized interventions.
|
||||
- Enhanced overall operational integrity and safety.
|
||||
- Deployed a security framework significantly reducing the risk of unauthorized C2 interference and data interception.
|
||||
- Ensured integrity and confidentiality of sensitive payload data during flight and post-processing.
|
||||
- Enhanced overall operational resilience and safety for UAV missions through validated security measures.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 5: AI-Driven Threat Detection
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 5: AI-Driven Network Anomaly Detection
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
Created an AI-driven threat detection system that leverages machine learning algorithms to identify and mitigate cyber threats in real time.
|
||||
Designed and implemented an AI-driven anomaly detection system leveraging machine learning to identify potentially malicious network activities that evade traditional signature-based detection methods.
|
||||
|
||||
### Objectives
|
||||
- Trained machine learning models on historical threat data.
|
||||
- Integrated AI algorithms into existing security infrastructure.
|
||||
- Developed real-time monitoring and alerting mechanisms.
|
||||
- Curated and pre-processed NetFlow data and firewall logs for model training.
|
||||
- Developed and trained Isolation Forest and Autoencoder models to establish baseline network behavior.
|
||||
- Integrated the trained models with the ELK Stack for real-time log analysis.
|
||||
- Implemented alerting mechanisms within Kibana for detected anomalies, prioritized by deviation scores.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools & Technologies
|
||||
- Machine Learning Libraries (TensorFlow, PyTorch)
|
||||
- Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) Systems
|
||||
- Real-time Analytics Tools
|
||||
- Machine Learning Libraries (Scikit-learn, Keras)
|
||||
- Data Processing Tools (Pandas, Logstash)
|
||||
- Log Management & Analytics (ELK Stack: Elasticsearch, Logstash, Kibana)
|
||||
- Network Data Sources (NetFlow, Firewall Logs)
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome
|
||||
- Improved threat detection accuracy and response time.
|
||||
- Enhanced adaptability to emerging cyber threats.
|
||||
- Facilitated a more proactive approach to cybersecurity.
|
||||
- Developed a system capable of detecting novel network anomalies potentially indicative of zero-day threats.
|
||||
- Reduced mean-time-to-detect for specific classes of anomalous behavior compared to manual analysis.
|
||||
- Provided security analysts with prioritized, actionable alerts, improving response efficiency.
|
||||
- Enhanced proactive threat hunting capabilities by highlighting unusual network patterns.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 6: Secure Ground Amateur Antennas for Space Communication
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 6: Secure SDR Implementation for Amateur Ground Stations
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
Led a project focused on securing ground-based amateur antennas for space communication, using Software-Defined Radio (SDR) to ensure the integrity of space-to-ground transmissions.
|
||||
Led a project focused on securing ground-based amateur antennas for space communication, using Software-Defined Radio (SDR) techniques to ensure the integrity and authenticity of space-to-ground transmissions from amateur satellites.
|
||||
|
||||
### Objectives
|
||||
- Designed and implemented secure protocols for SDR.
|
||||
- Analyzed potential vulnerabilities in existing antenna systems.
|
||||
- Coordinated with space agencies to align with communication standards.
|
||||
- Implemented secure demodulation and decoding pipelines within GNU Radio.
|
||||
- Analyzed and mitigated risks associated with RF interference and spoofing targeting amateur SDR setups.
|
||||
- Developed methods using digital signatures (where feasible) for verifying received satellite transmissions.
|
||||
- Documented and shared secure SDR processing workflows with the amateur radio community.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools & Technologies
|
||||
- Software-Defined Radio (SDR) Technologies
|
||||
- Encryption and Secure Data Transmission
|
||||
- Geospatial Intelligence Tools (ArcGIS)
|
||||
- SDR Software (GNU Radio Companion, GQRX)
|
||||
- SDR Hardware (RTL-SDR, USRP)
|
||||
- Signal Processing Libraries (GNU Radio DSP blocks, SciPy)
|
||||
- Authentication Techniques (GPG for signature verification)
|
||||
- RF Analysis Tools (Spectrum Analyzers)
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome
|
||||
- Established a secure communication channel between space missions and ground stations.
|
||||
- Enhanced data integrity and reliability in space-to-ground transmissions.
|
||||
- Contributed to the broader community of space communication enthusiasts.
|
||||
- Created secure SDR processing workflows enhancing data integrity for amateur satellite communications.
|
||||
- Increased ground station resilience against common RF spoofing and interference techniques.
|
||||
- Contributed practical security guidelines and reusable GNU Radio blocks to the open-source space community.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 7: Lunar Analog Habitat Cybersecurity Protocol
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 7: Lunar Analog Habitat Cybersecurity Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
Designed and implemented cybersecurity protocols for a Lunar Analog Habitat, focusing on safeguarding critical systems and communication channels in a lunar environment.
|
||||
Designed and implemented cybersecurity protocols for a Lunar Analog Habitat simulation, focusing on safeguarding critical life support, communication, and research systems in an isolated, high-latency environment.
|
||||
|
||||
### Objectives
|
||||
- Development of encryption methods tailored to space communication.
|
||||
- Implementation of intrusion detection and continuous monitoring systems.
|
||||
- Collaboration with space agencies to ensure alignment with lunar operation standards.
|
||||
- Developed a Zero Trust security model adapted for the habitat's segmented network.
|
||||
- Implemented robust multi-factor authentication (MFA) and end-to-end encryption (TLS 1.3) for all internal and external communications.
|
||||
- Deployed intrusion detection (Zeek sensors) and continuous monitoring systems integrated with a central SIEM.
|
||||
- Secured critical environmental control systems using network isolation and protocol-aware monitoring.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools & Technologies
|
||||
- Encryption Technologies
|
||||
- Intrusion Detection Systems
|
||||
- Space Communication Protocols
|
||||
- Zero Trust Principles Implementation (Micro-segmentation via VLANs/Firewalls, Identity Management)
|
||||
- Strong Encryption Standards (TLS 1.3, AES-256)
|
||||
- Network Intrusion Detection System (Zeek)
|
||||
- SIEM Platform (ELK Stack)
|
||||
- Secure Remote Access (IPSec VPN)
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome
|
||||
- Protection of a remote habitat from potential cyber threats.
|
||||
- Demonstrated resilience in a unique and challenging space environment.
|
||||
- Contribution to the future of secure space exploration and habitation.
|
||||
- Established robust protection for simulated critical habitat systems against potential cyber threats.
|
||||
- Demonstrated resilient secure communication capabilities despite simulated high-latency links.
|
||||
- Contributed a practical security architecture model applicable to future secure space exploration and habitation designs.
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 8: Family Office Cybersecurity Solution
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Project 8: Family Office Cybersecurity Framework
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
Developed a tailored cybersecurity framework for Family Offices, addressing the financial, legal, and privacy concerns of high-net-worth individuals and families.
|
||||
Developed a tailored cybersecurity framework for a Family Office, addressing the unique financial, legal, and privacy concerns of high-net-worth individuals and families against targeted cyber threats.
|
||||
|
||||
### Objectives
|
||||
- Design of robust protection against cyber threats like phishing, ransomware, and identity theft.
|
||||
- Implementation of secure communication channels and encrypted data storage.
|
||||
- Creation of personalized cybersecurity training for family members and staff.
|
||||
- Designed robust protection against sophisticated phishing, ransomware, and identity theft attempts.
|
||||
- Implemented secure communication channels (Signal, ProtonMail) and encrypted data storage (VeraCrypt).
|
||||
- Deployed advanced endpoint protection and secure network configurations for home and office environments.
|
||||
- Created and delivered personalized cybersecurity awareness training for family members and staff.
|
||||
|
||||
### Tools & Technologies
|
||||
- Secure Communication Channels
|
||||
- Encryption Technologies
|
||||
- Personalized Training Modules
|
||||
- Secure Communication Platforms (Signal, ProtonMail)
|
||||
- Full Disk & File Encryption (VeraCrypt, BitLocker)
|
||||
- Advanced Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR) Solution
|
||||
- Enterprise-Grade Firewall/VPN Appliance
|
||||
- Password Managers & Hardware Security Keys (MFA)
|
||||
- Custom Phishing Simulation & Training Platform
|
||||
|
||||
### Outcome
|
||||
- Comprehensive protection for sensitive information and assets.
|
||||
- Improved confidence in secure Family Office operations.
|
||||
- Tailored solutions addressing unique challenges faced by high-net-worth families.
|
||||
- Established comprehensive protection reducing exposure for sensitive information and financial assets.
|
||||
- Improved confidence in secure Family Office operations through implemented technical controls and training.
|
||||
- Delivered tailored solutions addressing the unique cybersecurity challenges and risk profile faced by high-net-worth families.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Загрузка…
x
Ссылка в новой задаче
Block a user