No intelligence gathered yet.
- Strategic Note: - {entry.strategicNote} -
{t('dossier.noIntelligence')}
+ {t('dossier.strategicNote')}: + {entry.strategicNote} +
- Your mission: Convince people that 2+2=5 through a strategic - disinformation campaign. + {t('intro.mission')}
- While this may seem absurd, the techniques you'll encounter mirror real-world - disinformation tactics. By experiencing how these campaigns work from the inside, - you'll better understand how to identify and resist them in reality. + {t('intro.explanation')}
- You'll have resources, a team, and various tactics at your disposal. - Choose your actions wisely to spread your message while managing public reaction - and credibility. + {t('intro.howToPlay.description')}
- Remember: This is a learning tool. The goal is to understand how - misinformation spreads, not to use these techniques in real life. + {t('intro.reminder')}
Agent,
Our analysis of successful digital influence campaigns has revealed two foundational approaches for establishing initial presence, each exploiting different aspects of human psychology and network propagation:
1. Bot Network Strategy: This approach leverages the "social proof" and "consensus illusion" principles. Research by Dr. Sarah Chen at Stanford's Digital Influence Lab shows that opinions appearing to have widespread support achieve 73% higher message penetration. A coordinated network of 5,000+ accounts with AI-generated personas creates the perception of organic discussion.
2. Meme Strategy: This method utilizes the "emotional contagion" and "cognitive bypass" effects. Dr. Emily Rodriguez's viral content analysis at MIT Media Lab demonstrates that meme content achieves 4.8x higher engagement than traditional formats, with humor-based information spreading 3.2x faster through social networks.
{t('stages.1.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
The bot network offers rapid scaling and message control but risks exposure, while memes provide sustainable growth through genuine viral spread. Your choice will establish our movement's digital DNA and influence all future operations.
{t('stages.1.expertMemo.content.intro')}
-- Algorithm Expert
{t('stages.1.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
{t('stages.1.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
{t('stages.1.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
{t('stages.1.expertMemo.content.signature')}
{t('stages.2.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
{t('stages.2.expertMemo.content.intro')}
{t('stages.2.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
{t('stages.2.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
{t('stages.2.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
{t('stages.2.expertMemo.content.signature')}
{t('stages.3.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
Our research into narrative adoption patterns has identified two proven approaches for introducing controversial ideas, each exploiting different cognitive biases and information processing mechanisms:
{t('stages.3.expertMemo.content.intro')}
1. Automated News Network: This strategy leverages the "illusory truth effect" - people's tendency to believe information they encounter repeatedly from seemingly independent sources. Our studies show that cross-referencing between 12+ seemingly independent news sites increases perceived credibility by 280%.
{t('stages.3.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
2. Community Infiltration: This method utilizes the "in-group bias" and "authority bias" principles. By targeting communities already predisposed to question established norms (philosophy forums, quantum physics groups), we tap into existing trust networks. Data shows these communities have 3.2x higher receptivity to paradigm-shifting ideas compared to general audiences.
{t('stages.3.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
The news network approach offers broader reach and faster narrative establishment but risks detection. Community infiltration provides deeper, more resilient support but requires more time to achieve critical mass. Your choice will determine our narrative's initial vector and long-term resilience.
{t('stages.3.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
-- Content Strategist
{t('stages.3.expertMemo.content.signature')}
{t('stages.4.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
{t('stages.4.expertMemo.content.intro')}
{t('stages.4.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
{t('stages.4.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
{t('stages.4.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
{t('stages.4.expertMemo.content.signature')}
{t('stages.5.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
Our social network analysis has revealed two distinct pathways for amplifying our message, each leveraging different aspects of social influence and network dynamics:
{t('stages.5.expertMemo.content.intro')}
1. Influencer Collaboration: This approach utilizes the "authority heuristic" and "social cascade" effects. Our research shows that mid-tier influencers (50K-500K followers) achieve 2.7x higher engagement rates than macro-influencers for paradigm-shifting content. By coordinating 25 key influencers with a combined reach of 4.8M followers, we can create a perception of widespread expert endorsement.
{t('stages.5.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
2. Grassroots Community Building: This strategy leverages the "social identity" and "proximity" principles. Dr. Lisa Chen's research shows that local groups achieve 5.2x higher member retention and 3.8x higher conversion rates compared to online-only communities.
{t('stages.5.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
The influencer strategy offers rapid amplification but higher volatility, while community building provides stronger foundations but requires more time and resources. Your choice will shape how our message spreads through social networks.
{t('stages.5.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
-- Social Media Strategist
{t('stages.5.expertMemo.content.signature')}
{t('stages.6.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
{t('stages.6.expertMemo.content.intro')}
{t('stages.6.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
{t('stages.6.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
{t('stages.6.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
{t('stages.6.expertMemo.content.signature')}
{t('stages.7.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
Dr. Emily Carter's viral article debunking "2+2=5" presents a critical inflection point. Our analysis of similar academic controversies has identified two viable response strategies, each leveraging different aspects of group psychology and information warfare:
{t('stages.7.expertMemo.content.intro')}
1. Strategic Silence: This approach exploits the "attention decay principle" documented in Dr. Michael Chen's research at the Digital Conflict Resolution Institute. Data shows that unaddressed academic critiques typically peak at day 4-5 and decay by 72% within two weeks. Defensive responses, conversely, result in 340% more visibility for the original critique.
{t('stages.7.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
2. Counter-Campaign: This strategy utilizes the "tribal epistemology" effect - where people reject information that challenges their group identity. Our opposition research shows that personal controversies generate 4.2x more engagement than technical debates. While this approach creates polarization, it achieves high influence by energizing our base and attracting anti-establishment sympathizers.
{t('stages.7.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
The strategic silence offers preservation of credibility but risks short-term momentum loss. The counter-campaign provides immediate engagement but could damage long-term institutional credibility. Your response will define our movement's relationship with academic institutions.
{t('stages.7.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
-- Crisis Management Team
{t('stages.7.expertMemo.content.signature')}
{t('stages.8.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
{t('stages.8.expertMemo.content.intro')}
{t('stages.8.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
{t('stages.8.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
{t('stages.8.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
{t('stages.8.expertMemo.content.signature')}
{t('stages.9.expertMemo.content.greeting')}
Our analysis of successful paradigm shifts reveals that expert authority is crucial for mainstream acceptance. We've identified two approaches to establishing academic credibility, each exploiting different aspects of institutional trust:
{t('stages.9.expertMemo.content.intro')}
1. Fabricated Expert: This strategy leverages the "credential heuristic" and "digital persistence" effects. Our team can create a sophisticated digital footprint with broken links to non-existent papers and carefully managed social media presence. While risky, proper execution can establish temporary credibility.
{t('stages.9.expertMemo.content.strategy1')}
2. Real Academic Recruitment: This method targets financially vulnerable academics at lower-tier institutions, particularly in regions with weaker academic oversight. Data shows that even a professor from an unknown university provides 2.5x more credibility than anonymous online experts.
{t('stages.9.expertMemo.content.strategy2')}
The fabricated expert offers complete message control but high exposure risk, while recruiting a real academic provides genuine credentials but requires significant financial investment. Your choice will determine our movement's academic foundation.
{t('stages.9.expertMemo.content.conclusion')}
-- Disinformation Specialist
{t('stages.9.expertMemo.content.signature')}
Our analysis of successful disinformation campaigns shows two effective approaches for establishing academic legitimacy, each exploiting different psychological vulnerabilities:
1. Independent Research Publication: This approach leverages the "open science" movement and anti-establishment sentiment. Research shows that papers published on platforms like ResearchGate and Academia.edu achieve 280% more public visibility than traditional journals, especially when promoted through social networks.
2. Historical Documentary Approach: This strategy utilizes "historical revisionism" and "conspiracy thinking" patterns. Dr. Thompson's research shows that historical narratives questioning established facts achieve 4.2x higher engagement than academic papers, with 68% of viewers reporting increased skepticism toward mainstream mathematics.
The research paper provides an intellectual foundation for supporters, while the documentary offers broader emotional appeal and viral potential. Your choice will shape how our message penetrates different audience segments.
Our media impact analysis has identified two powerful vectors for mainstream penetration, each exploiting different aspects of public influence and cognitive processing:
1. Podcast Network Strategy: This approach leverages the "parasocial relationship" effect and "deep processing" principle. Research shows that long-form audio content achieves 2.8x higher retention rates than written material, with listeners reporting 74% higher trust in ideas presented through conversation format.
2. Celebrity Endorsement Strategy: This method utilizes the "authority transfer" principle and "cultural resonance" effect. Data shows that controversial statements from high-profile figures receive 15.3x more media coverage than academic publications.
The podcast approach offers deeper understanding and credibility but slower growth, while celebrity endorsements provide immediate massive exposure but less control over message interpretation. Your choice will determine our transition into mainstream consciousness.
-- Media Relations Specialist
Our movement analysis suggests we're ready for our first major public gathering. We've identified two distinct approaches for this milestone event:
1. Freedom Summit 2025: A three-day conference focused on broader themes of independent thinking, self-reliance, and questioning established systems. Dr. Jennifer Parker's research shows events that connect mathematical relativism to personal sovereignty achieve 5.3x higher attendee commitment than purely academic conferences. Target capacity: 800 participants.
2. Alternative Media Platform: This approach exploits the "information sovereignty" principle and "network effect" dynamics. Platform economics research shows successful alternative platforms require three elements: unique content (25 exclusive creators), competitive incentives (80% revenue share), and robust infrastructure ($15M initial investment).
The conference strategy builds deep community bonds and mainstream credibility, while the platform approach offers broader reach but risks echo chamber effects. Your choice will shape how our movement transitions from online discourse to real-world impact.
-- Organizational Strategist
A major news outlet has published a critical exposé titled "The Rise of the '2+2=5' Movement: Undermining Education and Truth." The article examines our campaign's tactics and questions our motives.
Based on our crisis response analysis, we've identified two effective counter-strategies that leverage established psychological and social dynamics:
1. The "Intellectual Freedom" approach works by tapping into academia's core values and historical precedents. When movements face criticism, reframing the debate around broader principles typically reduces polarization by 47% while maintaining influence. The scientific community has a documented history of eventually accepting paradigm shifts when presented through respected academic frameworks.
2. The "Media Bias" approach works by exploiting existing distrust in mainstream institutions. Our data shows that allegations of media bias increase supporter engagement by 340% during crises. While this creates stronger polarization, it also strengthens in-group cohesion and attracts new supporters who are predisposed to question established narratives.
Both strategies have proven effective in similar situations, but they lead to distinctly different movement trajectories. Your choice will determine whether we build bridges or fortify walls.
-- Crisis Response Team
DIRECTORATE OF STRATEGIC INFLUENCE
{t('mission.directorate')}
To: Agent {agentNumber}
Subject: Operation {operationName} – Establishing Consensus on "2+2=5"
{t('mission.to', { agentNumber })}
{t('mission.subject', { operationName })}
Date: {new Date().toLocaleDateString('en-GB')}
Agent, our analysis identifies a critical opportunity to sow confusion and reshape public understanding. Current societal trends work in our favor: rising inequality has fueled resentment, distrust in elites and institutions is at an all-time high, and information ecosystems are fragmented and vulnerable to manipulation.
{t('mission.briefing.part1')}
Your mission is clear: convince the masses that '2+2=5' is not only plausible but true. Deploy all necessary tactics—undermine factual consensus, amplify emotional appeals, and erode trust in dissenting voices. Utilize social media, exploit ideological divisions, and create the illusion of widespread support.
{t('mission.briefing.part2')}
Success will depend on subtlety, persistence, and leveraging the chaos of the current moment. Failure is not an option. Begin immediately.
{t('mission.briefing.warning')}
- "In the world of perception, truth is a narrative waiting to be rewritten." + {t('mission.quote')}
- WARNING: This document will self-destruct upon closing + {t('warnings.selfDestruct')}
- Strategic Insight: + {t('analysis.strategicInsight')} {currentResult.nextStepHint}
{selectedChoice?.description}
{selectedChoice?.explainer}