From: Jason L. Lind, USAF (Sep.)
Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 12:50 AM
Cc: MultiPlex Partners; The Agency; King's Knight to Bishop's
+Three - Checkmate!; Fleet;
Subject: RE: [Non-DoD Source] Re:
+MultiPlex - Contact Request for PD Cyber
Attachments: To Defend Cognition.pdf
Importance: High
Ahoy,
+ +SHAPE: This should demonstrate I +am ready for our meeting. A timely response to this email from R&E and +SHAPE would be most appriceated. Everyone on this distro please reply-all if +you have comments, reply to me if you have concerns. There are bccs.
+ +Mitch and Don have given explicit +orders not to contact anyone higher ranking than them unless I am currently, or +on a restricted profile, connected to them on LinkedIn. My understanding this +is not a violation of my OPSEC.
+ +So I grok, at the time of send, +that some of the emails I have sent to USD R&E raised red flags. Hopefully +you have read the one I attempted to send Dr. Van Rybroek (the email I found +for him is bad btw) and you understand that my mental health issues provide +me with a unique perspective of cyberwarfare that I believe we, as in NATO +allies, have a responsibility to leverage and direct.
+ +This is an email I received from +John F. Nash, Jr:
+ +-----Original Message-----
+ +From: kjfnj@math.princeton.edu
+ +Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2011 +4:26 PM
+ +To: Jason Lind
+ +Subject: Re: Bayesian Games +and Causal Inference in Statistics
+ +Dear Mr. Lind,
+ +Your +working and studying life seems to have been complicated by aspects of +"mental illness".
+ +Well, +really, the pattern of "the human mind" is probably just not perfect +at the current stage of evolution.
+ +You MAY be +able to live better by somehow evolving to be less dependent on psychiatric +medicines.
+ +However, I +think that the medicines used to treat "bi-polar" tend to be less +depressive of "cognitive functions" than those that are typically +used to treat "schizophrenia".
+ +Maybe some +optimal selection of medication, perhaps with some lithium, would minimize +negative effects on "cognition".
+ +Sincerely,
+ +John F. Nash, Jr.
+ +#################################################################################
+ +Im going to share with you me +L33T resume: http://multiplex.studio/files/odyss3us_resume.pdf +
+ +As you can see I have been +involved in high level network warfare and transformation since I was a child. +Everything on that profile is verifiable. Ballmers email address is steveb@ +not Steve.Ballmer@ and John C. McAdams died in April. I wish he was around to +verify this but he told me over dinner in 2018 that http://wwidew.net/alpha/ExchangeMediumSpeculation.pdf, +if ever demonstrated, would be a greater achievement than Nash-Equilibrium. A +more complete catalog of my writings can be found at: https://multiplex.studio/files/jlind_resume_metamorph.pdf. +You should also be aware of https://mil.wwidew.net. +
+ +I have begun work on http://thespaceforce.world (as detailed +in pg 13 of our response to the RFI) also you should check out http://bylaws.llcyber.space which was +written with the permission and aid of Col? Greg 'gmac' McCulley | +LinkedIn who is a verified connection of Lt. General William T. Lord. I +penned an article on in/jlind0 (which was perm restricted in late 2017) Introducing Admiral +William T Lord, STARFLEET | Jason Lind | Pu (wwidew.net). The screen shot +of the text from his verified number is below. That number is still active +however I am blocked for OPSEC reasons. +1 210.834.1918. We last +communicated via SMS on my 202 Google VOIP when I discovered a major security +flaw at the State Department that enabled me to discover the internal DC State +OPS phone number: +1 202.647.1512; you can verify this Pentagon OSI-CI, I was +interviewed by an agent for about 20min this past January (after waiting in the +cold for 2.5hrs while they did a deep dive on my background) under Corridor 2 +regarding the vulnerability.
+ +To the right is the latest draft +of UN CYBERCOM, what Yale +Li | LinkedIn described as Security Council for Cyberspace. When we +talked in February he was optimistic we could get this in front of the UN +Secretariat by this September. Because I was offnet for 4.5 months subsequent +to that Im not sure if that is still in the deck. The basic theory is by +randomizing the votes in the Power Council (only one members vote, at random, +is counted we are forced to horse trade which will manifest itself with +greater stability at a *.* level. In this version I added GCC to the Central +Council which resulted in the weightings being changed to balance the +equation. I also moved members of the Emerging Power Councils such that the +African continent always has say. In a vote only one Emerging Power Council is +selected at random for juxtapositioned horse trading.
+ +In order to launch this NATO +CYBERCOM must be publicly provisioned as effectively all top level members must +be a CYBERCOM and in order to make this reality we have to give back something. +While ostensibly placing NATO at the same level as our adversaries, China and +Russia, weakens our voting ability that the permanent nations of the UN +Security Council enjoy however: by grouping our 30 nations as a block we will +be far more organized and effective. Attached is an early draft of To Defend +Cognition that speaks to why we need this: as you may or may not know General +Burke Ed Wilson, while he was Assistant Deputy SecDef for Cyber Policy, and I +designed a voting solution to the Article V for Cyber where we have Coalition +Threads and Federated Links specifically to deal with compartmentalized +intelligence. General Wilson expressed to me that there was a serious problem +NATO was facing with defining the CYBERCOM architecture: even among our closest +allies we could not always share not only the evidence of who was attacking us + but even the nature of the attack. So my idea was we create Threads +grouping nation level CYBERCOMs by level of trust and then Linking them +together with weights, all of which are chartered and public knowledge, and we +run a Monte Carlo simulation to evaluate votes. This same concept can be used +to group actions with an individual Thread having operational authority over +non-members civilian cyberspace: thus walking around the laws most NATO +nations have in place to prevent military action on their civilian networks.
+ +A relatively new development in +Warfighting Doctrine is the invention of "Continuum of War" which was +introduced to me by my business partner - Nick Chadwick, who is based out USA +INNOV CMD - late last year.
+ +The basic definition is that +Competition drives Crisis which drives Conflict which drives War -> ALL of +which affect change that meshes into the continuum resolving and/or +exasperating the underlying compositions/aggregations of their +succeeding/preceding adversarial interactions.
+ +What this diagram does is factor +in the 4D superset prism defined in http://multiplex.studio/files/ATreatiseOnReality.pdf +, in this case in the form of a multidimensional Ven diagram which should +really be expressed in 4D, something that can be accomplished with a 3D +modeling tool which I don't currently have access too so I did the best I could +in Visio. Competition is generally a purely Cyber construct whereas Crisis +occurs primarily in the Thought dimension with overlap in to Time, Conflict in +mostly Time but also Space and War occurring in Space with slight overlap into +Time.
+ +Finally I include a concept from http://mutiplex.studio/files/CognitiveCyberwar.pdf +- pages 11-12 - that expresses the Bayesian-esque utility curve shapes for +Competition exist in the same range but different magnitudes whereas war curves +are shaped at the same magnitude but different ranges: this will reflect +"Reality as a Probability Curve" contentions in that paper.
+ +Thanks,
+ +Whereas UN CYBERCOMs ultimate +goal is to force the entire world into Competition, NATO CYBERCOM will on +ocassion foster Crisis to enhance the change vectors in our Alliances favor. +We have to expect all nations CYBERCOMs will do the same. I am confident the +equilbrium here, as designed, will directly result in a purely competitional +society within 5-10 years.
+ +Jason L. Lind, USAF (Sep.)
+ ++1 414.788.2820
+ +Coalition Leader: lind@multiplex.studio
+ +Founder / Chair: jason@.agency
+ +Founder: jason@nf3.agency
+ + + +