USAFFlightPlan United States Air Force Energy Flight Plan Enforcing Mission Assurance through Energy Assurance USAF United States Air Force USAF Fly, Fight and Win in Air, Space and Cyberspace USAFEnergy United States Air Force Energy Flight Plan Committee Committee The goals and objectives outlined in this Flight Plan define what success means to the Air Force in the context of the Strategic Master Plan ASECEng Miranda A.A. Ballentine Miranda Ballentine miranda.aa.ballentine.civ@mail.mil Performer MissionRisks_Cyber MissionRisks_Physical MissionRisks_SevereWeather Enhance Mission Assurance through Energy Assurance Financial Input Output EnergyCost FinancialRisks_BudgetShare FinancialRisks_Austerity Geopolitical Input Output OptimizeDemand GeopoliticalRisks_SupplyDemandGap GeopoliticalRisks_Cost Input Output EnergyCost GeopoliticalRisks_Conflicts GeopoliticalRisks_SupplyDisruption Environmental EnvironmentalRisks_Greenhouse EnvironmentalRisks_Water EnvironmentalRisks_FramlandUsage ImproveResilency Improve Resiliency ApproachToEnergy Resiliency_SinglePointFailure Eliminate Single Point(s) of Failure Eliminate 20% of the single point(s) of failure for facility energy associated with Air Force owned and operated critical infrastructure by FY25 1.1 MD_PointOfFailure Points of Failure Percent 2017-01-01 2025-12-31 -20 Resiliency_Technologies Increase the use of energy resilience technology By FY20, increase the use of energy resiliency technologies and partnerships for critical infrastructure to improve energy security. Incorporate energy resiliency considerations, such as cybersecure microgrids, for critical infrastructure by FY20. 1.2 MD_EnergyResilience Energy Resiliency Ability to anticipate, prepare for, and adapt to changing conditions and withstand, respond to, and recovery rapidly from energy disruptions. 2017-01-01 2020-12-31 Partnerships and Technologies Increase use of energy resilient technologies and partnerships 2017-01-01 2020-12-31 Incorporate energy resiliency considerations, such as cybersecure microgrids, for critical infrastructure by FY20. FinalizeEnergyPlans Finalize Energy Plans By FY19, finalize energy plans for installations that together compose 75 percent of the Air Force’s installation energy consumption and include requirements to enhancing energy reliance. 1.3 MD_InstallationByEnergy Installations by Energy Consumption Percent 2017-01-01 2019-12-31 75 IncorporateAwarenessIntoTraining Finalize Energy Plans Incorporate energy awareness into training by FY18 to enable Airmen to recognize the impact of energy on critical operations 1.4 MD_Training Airmen Training 2017-01-01 2018-12-31 Incorporate Recognize impact of energy on critical operations DevelopPartnerApproach Develop Partnership Approach Develop an approach by FY18 to partner with joint, international, federal, state, local and private partners to improve energy security 1.5 MD_Partnership Partners 2017-01-01 2018-12-31 Approach improve energy security FinalizeEnergyPlans Finalize Energy Plans By FY36 all mission-critical functions will have assured access to a reliable supply to energy at all times 1.6 MD_AssuredAccessToReliableEnergy Assured Access to Reliable Energy Percent 2017-01-01 2036-12-31 100 Identify vulnerabilities energy supplies, such as physical and cyber-attacks or natural disators Supports Intent Output ImprovedResponsiveness Mitigate Impacts from disruptions in energy supplies to critical assets, installations and priority missions Supports Intent Output IncreasedAbility Develop Ability to prioritize resources against risks to the mission Supports Intent Output PrioritizedResourcePlans Advance Security Advance physical and cyber security solutions to protect critical energy assets and secure industrial controls systems Supports Intent ImprovedResponsiveness Improved Responsiveness to disruptions to energy supply Supports ExpectedOutcome IncreasedAbility Increased ability to quickly resume normal operations and mitigate impact to the mission Supports ExpectedOutcome PrioritizedResourcePlans Prioritized Resource Plans and Solutions to mitigate risks from the tail (logistics supply chain) and the tooth (energy demand in operations) Supports ExpectedOutcome AssuredAbility Assured Ability to provide energy for mission-critical function Supports ExpectedOutcome OptimizeDemand Optimize Demand ApproachToEnergy Increase Energy Efficiency and operational efficiency for Air Force systems Supports Intent Output DecreasedAmount DecreasedAmount Decreased amount of energy required by Air Force systems and operations without negative mission impacts Supports ExpectedOutcome Enhance Capabilities by focusing on the energy to achieve the Air Force mission Supports Intent Output IncreasedFlexibility IncreasedFlexibility Increased Flexibility range, and endurance in all operations Supports ExpectedOutcome Build Energy Considerations into Air Force research, development, test and evaluation (RDT&E) efforts Supports Intent Output MaturedLongTermFocus MaturedLongTermFocus Matured Long Term Focused solutions to Air Force energy challenges Supports ExpectedOutcome AssureSupply Assure Supply ApproachToEnergy Integrate alternative energy sources compatible with mission requirements Supports Intent Output AccessToCleanEnergy AccessToCleanEnergy Access to clean energy resources and supply chains based on asset and mission priorities Supports ExpectedOutcome Diversity drop-in sources of energy Supports Intent Output IncreasedFlexibilityOps IncreasedFlexibilityOps Increased flexibility in all operations Supports ExpectedOutcome GoalApproach> Goal Approach ApproachToEnergy Air Force Approach to Energy ApproachLoop Continuous application of innovation and technology ApproachInnovation Innovation Input Output ApproachTech Airmen Airmen Allies Allies Industry Industry ApproachTech Technology Input Output ApproachInnovation USAFEnergyClassification Air Force Energy Classification Energy Energy OperationalEng Operational InstallationEng Installation Intent IntentVsOutcome ExpectedOutcome IntentVsOutcome DoDEnergyConsumption DoD Current State Energy Consumption NonUSAFCurrentStateEnergy EnergyConsumption Percent Percent Tangible 52 USAFCurrentStateEnergy EnergyConsumption Percent 48 USAFEnergyCostBreakdown USAFVehicles EnergyCost Percent Tangible 3 USAFFacilities EnergyCost Percent Tangible 11 USAFAviationFuel EnergyCost Percent Tangible 86 USAFCoreMissions USAF Core Missions Input Energy AirSpaceSuperiorityMission Air & Space Superiority 1 ISRMission Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) 2 RapidGlobalMobilityMission Rapid Global Mobility 3 GlobalStrikeMission Global Strike 4 C2Mission Command and Control 5 StrategicTrends Strategic Trends EmergingBreakthroughs Rapidly Emerging Technological Breakthroughs GeopoliticalInstability Geopolitical Instability Input Geopolitical RangeOfOperatingEnv Wide Range of Operating Environments Input OperationalEng GlobalCommons Increasing Importance and Vulnerability of Global Commons JasonLLind Jason L. Lind, USAF (Sep.) Jason Lind JasonLindContact Landline +1 608.301.1113 Cell +1 414.788.2820 lind@multiplex.studio
Institution Mendota Mental Health Institution 301 Troy Dr. Madison Wisconsin 53704 USA
Home W2773 County Rd HH Dalton Wisconsin 53926 USA
http://www.linkedin.com/in/odyss3us
2017-01-01 2036-01-01 2020-09-30