cognitive/docs/guides/linking_validation.md
Daniel Ari Friedman 6caa1a7cb1 Update
2025-02-07 08:16:25 -08:00

267 строки
6.0 KiB
Markdown

# Documentation Linking Validation Guide
---
title: Documentation Linking Validation
type: guide
status: stable
created: 2024-02-06
tags:
- validation
- linking
- documentation
- quality
semantic_relations:
- type: implements
links:
- [[linking_completeness]]
- [[ai_validation_framework]]
- type: extends
links: [[obsidian_linking]]
---
## Overview
This guide establishes comprehensive validation rules and patterns for maintaining high-quality documentation linking across the cognitive modeling system.
## Validation Framework
### Core Link Types
```yaml
link_categories:
theoretical:
- type: concept_hierarchy
required: true
validation: strict
pattern: "[[parent_concept]] -> [[child_concept]]"
- type: implementation
required: true
validation: strict
pattern: "[[concept]] -> [[implementation]]"
research:
- type: experimental
required: true
validation: flexible
pattern: "[[theory]] -> [[experiment]] -> [[results]]"
- type: literature
required: false
validation: flexible
pattern: "[[paper]] -> [[findings]] -> [[integration]]"
documentation:
- type: guide_reference
required: true
validation: strict
pattern: "[[guide]] -> [[reference]] -> [[example]]"
- type: api_documentation
required: true
validation: strict
pattern: "[[api]] -> [[implementation]] -> [[test]]"
```
### Validation Rules
#### 1. Structural Validation
```python
# @structural_validation
validation_rules = {
"bidirectional": {
"concept_links": True, # Concepts must link both ways
"implementation_links": True,# Implementations must reference concepts
"test_links": True # Tests must link to implementations
},
"hierarchical": {
"max_depth": 5, # Maximum hierarchy depth
"required_levels": ["concept", "implementation", "test"],
"optional_levels": ["example", "extension"]
},
"completeness": {
"required_sections": 0.9, # 90% of required sections must be present
"optional_sections": 0.7, # 70% of optional sections recommended
"metadata_fields": 1.0 # All required metadata must be present
}
}
```
#### 2. Semantic Validation
```python
# @semantic_validation
semantic_rules = {
"relationship_types": {
"implements": "Direct implementation of concept",
"extends": "Extension or enhancement",
"requires": "Dependency relationship",
"relates": "Related but independent"
},
"context_validation": {
"theoretical": ["concepts", "principles", "frameworks"],
"practical": ["implementations", "examples", "tests"],
"research": ["experiments", "results", "analysis"]
}
}
```
## Link Patterns
### 1. Knowledge Organization
```mermaid
graph TD
A[Core Concepts] --> B[Theoretical Framework]
B --> C[Implementation]
C --> D[Validation]
D --> E[Examples]
F[Research] --> G[Experiments]
G --> H[Results]
H --> I[Integration]
```
### 2. Documentation Flow
```mermaid
graph LR
A[Concepts] --> B[Guides]
B --> C[Examples]
C --> D[Tests]
D --> E[Validation]
F[API] --> G[Implementation]
G --> H[Documentation]
H --> I[Integration]
```
## Quality Metrics
### 1. Link Quality
```python
# @quality_metrics
quality_metrics = {
"structural": {
"completeness": "Percentage of required links present",
"consistency": "Consistency of link patterns",
"bidirectional": "Percentage of required bidirectional links"
},
"semantic": {
"accuracy": "Correctness of relationship types",
"relevance": "Relevance of linked content",
"context": "Appropriate context maintenance"
},
"maintenance": {
"freshness": "Recent validation/update",
"stability": "Link stability over time",
"coverage": "Documentation coverage"
}
}
```
### 2. Validation Thresholds
```yaml
quality_thresholds:
critical:
structural_completeness: 0.95
semantic_accuracy: 0.90
bidirectional_completion: 0.85
standard:
structural_completeness: 0.85
semantic_accuracy: 0.80
bidirectional_completion: 0.75
minimum:
structural_completeness: 0.70
semantic_accuracy: 0.65
bidirectional_completion: 0.60
```
## Validation Process
### 1. Automated Checks
```python
# @validation_process
def validate_documentation():
"""
Validation steps:
1. Scan all documentation files
2. Extract and validate links
3. Check relationship types
4. Verify bidirectional links
5. Generate quality report
"""
pass
```
### 2. Manual Review
- Regular link audits
- Content relevance review
- Context verification
- Quality assessment
## Integration Points
### 1. Documentation System
```yaml
integration_points:
obsidian:
- graph_visualization
- backlink_tracking
- relationship_mapping
validation:
- automated_checks
- quality_metrics
- report_generation
maintenance:
- link_updates
- content_synchronization
- version_control
```
### 2. Development Workflow
```yaml
workflow_integration:
pre_commit:
- link_validation
- quality_check
- report_generation
continuous:
- automated_monitoring
- issue_detection
- notification_system
periodic:
- comprehensive_audit
- quality_assessment
- improvement_planning
```
## Best Practices
### 1. Link Management
- Maintain clear hierarchies
- Use consistent patterns
- Update bidirectional links
- Regular validation
### 2. Quality Assurance
- Automated checking
- Regular audits
- Quality monitoring
- Issue resolution
### 3. Documentation Flow
- Clear structure
- Logical progression
- Proper categorization
- Context preservation
## Related Documentation
- [[linking_completeness]]
- [[ai_validation_framework]]
- [[obsidian_linking]]
- [[documentation_standards]]
## References
- [[validation_patterns]]
- [[quality_metrics]]
- [[documentation_tools]]
- [[maintenance_practices]]