121 строка
11 KiB
Markdown
121 строка
11 KiB
Markdown
# Evidence and Proof
|
||
|
||
## [Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Evidence) & [Skepticism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Skepticism)
|
||
|
||
- [BJM Evidence Based Medicine](https://ebm.bmj.com/)
|
||
|
||
1. [Burden of Proof](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy))
|
||
2. [Assertion](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speech_act)
|
||
3. [Evidence in Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Evidence_law)
|
||
4. [Burden of Proof in Law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(law))
|
||
5. [Jurisprudence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Justification_(jurisprudence))
|
||
6. [Legal Concept of Evidence](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence-legal/)
|
||
7. [Scientific Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_evidence)
|
||
8. [Theories](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Theories)
|
||
9. [Hypotheses](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Hypotheses)
|
||
10. [Doubt](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Doubt)
|
||
11. [Fact](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact)
|
||
12. [Statements](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Statements)
|
||
13. [Truth](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Truth)
|
||
14. [Belief_revision](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief_revision)
|
||
15. [Justification](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Justification_(epistemology))
|
||
16. [Cherry Picking](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherry_picking)
|
||
17. [Belief Perserverance](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belief_perseverance)
|
||
18. [Counterargument](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counterargument)
|
||
19. [Sources of Knowledge](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Sources_of_knowledge)
|
||
20. [Epistemic Closure](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemic_closure)
|
||
21. [Philosophy of Evidence](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/evidence/)
|
||
22. [Evidence](https://iep.utm.edu/evidence/)
|
||
23. [Evidence Based Practices](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Evidence-based_practices)
|
||
24. [Evidence Based Policy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence-based_policy)
|
||
25. [Documentary_evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Documentary_evidence)
|
||
26. [Eyewitness_testimony](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eyewitness_testimony)
|
||
27. [Eyewitnesses](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Eyewitness)
|
||
28. [Testimony](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Testimony)
|
||
29. [Forensic Science](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forensic_science)
|
||
30. [United_States_evidence_law](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:United_States_evidence_law)
|
||
* [Federal Rules of Evidence](https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/fre)
|
||
* [Preponderance of Evidence](https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/preponderance_of_the_evidence)
|
||
* [Evidence Lectures](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrHocdJpGBy3ej0nEDUwvzW8QdHmag0gy)
|
||
* [Evidence Crash Course](https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL0JgU9zLKXAEDXuidYyqkWIDqklGUcTbc)
|
||
* [The Federal Rules of Evidence - Part 1](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzPiwaLMTi4&t=738s)
|
||
* [The Federal Rules of Evidence - Part 2](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kobwQoPC-9k&t=2s)
|
||
* [The Federal Rules of Evidence - Part 3](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7IB74lXTQuI&t=7s)
|
||
31. [Hierarchy_of_evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hierarchy_of_evidence)
|
||
32. [Proof](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_(truth))
|
||
33. [Disconfirming Evidence](http://rebirthofreason.com/Articles/Rowlands/Disconfirming_Evidence.shtml)
|
||
34. [Validity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Validity_(statistics))
|
||
35. [Hearsay](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay)
|
||
36. [Trace Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trace_evidence)
|
||
37. [Confirmation Bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias)
|
||
38. [Demonstrative Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonstrative_evidence)
|
||
39. [Coraborating Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corroborating_evidence)
|
||
40. [Character Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Character_evidence)
|
||
41. [Circumstantial Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circumstantial_evidence)
|
||
42. [Transient Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transient_evidence)
|
||
43. [Anecdotal_evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence)
|
||
44. [Admissable Evidence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admissible_evidence)
|
||
45. [Evidence_of_absence](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_absence) [Discussion](https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/mnS2WYLCGJP2kQkRn/absence-of-evidence-is-evidence-of-absence)
|
||
46. [Survivorship_bias](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias)
|
||
47. [Memory](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Memory)
|
||
48. [Priming](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Priming_(psychology))
|
||
|
||
## People
|
||
|
||
1. [Ronald J Allen](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Ronald-J-Allen-80823481)
|
||
- [Relative plausibility and its critics](https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1365712718813781)
|
||
- [Evidence Probability and the Burden of Proof](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2245304)
|
||
- [Burdens of Proof](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2146184)
|
||
- [Mathematical Models of Evidence](https://philpapers.org/rec/ALLTPV)
|
||
- [The Common Law Theory of Experts: Deference or Education?](https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/fac_artchop/934/)
|
||
- [New Directions for Evidence Science](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEwfk9U0Bbc)
|
||
- [Ronald J. Allen, Evidence Theory or Science? Legal Epistemology Meets its Parents and Isn’t Pleased](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ1-n24r70U)
|
||
- [Standards of proof and the limits of legal analysis](https://philpapers.org/rec/ALLSOP)
|
||
2. [Andres Paez](https://philpeople.org/profiles/andres-paez/publications?app=320&order=added)
|
||
- [Evidential Reasoning and Cognitive Bias](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mhqtVYjUZaU)
|
||
- [Probability-lowering causes and the connotations of causation](https://philpapers.org/rec/PEZPCA)
|
||
- [The prediction of future behavior: The empty promises of expert clinical and actuarial testimony](https://philpapers.org/rec/PEZTPO-2)
|
||
- [Explanation, Understanding, and Belief Revision](https://www.academia.edu/37887976/Explanation_Understanding_and_Belief_Revision)
|
||
- [An Epistemological Analysis of the Use of Reputation as Evidence](https://philarchive.org/rec/PEZAEA)
|
||
- [Andrés Páez: Deciding whom to believe; testimony as evidence.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nfcAqdVJO0k)
|
||
3. [Susan Haack](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Haack)
|
||
- [Foundherentism](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundherentism)
|
||
4. [William Twining](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Twining)
|
||
- [William Twining: The Man Who Radicalized the Middle Ground](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3769135)
|
||
5. [Michael S Moore](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/Michael-S-Moore-2057632175)
|
||
- [Moore on Causation and Responsibility: Metaphysics or Intuition?](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2489256)
|
||
- [Michael S. Moore, Causation and Responsibility: An Essay in Law, Morals, and Metaphysics](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259709058_Michael_S_Moore_Causation_and_Responsibility_An_Essay_in_Law_Morals_and_Metaphysics)
|
||
- [Legal_Responsibility_and_Scalar_Causation](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328838995_Legal_Responsibility_and_Scalar_Causation)
|
||
- [INTRODUCTION: THE NATURE OF SINGULARIST THEORIES OF CAUSATION](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/298514473_INTRODUCTION_THE_NATURE_OF_SINGULARIST_THEORIES_OF_CAUSATION)
|
||
6. [John_Henry_Wigmore](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Henry_Wigmore)
|
||
7. [David A Schum](https://www.researchgate.net/scientific-contributions/David-A-Schum-2108621468)
|
||
8. [Richard Posner](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Posner)
|
||
9. [Jennifer Mnookin](https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=_yf8ST0AAAAJ&hl=en)
|
||
- [Of Black boxes, instruments, and experts: Testing the validity of forensic science](https://philpapers.org/rec/MNOOBB)
|
||
- [Jennifer L. Mnookin: The ongoing epistemic challenges of forensic science as legal evidence.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQJerKzZsRc)
|
||
- [Is Some Forensic Science "Junk" Science? Jennifer Mnookin Interview With Malcolm Fleschner](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TBgW4jzcDis)
|
||
- [The Uncertain Future of Forensic Science](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3300354)
|
||
10. [Jane Stapleton](https://researchers.anu.edu.au/researchers/stapleton-bj)
|
||
- [Legal Cause: Cause-in-Fact and the Scope of Liability for Consequences](https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol54/iss3/11/)
|
||
- [Review: Law, Causation and Common Sense](https://www.jstor.org/stable/764415)
|
||
- [Unnecessary Cause](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2276779)
|
||
11. [Paolo-Garbolino](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paolo-Garbolino)
|
||
- [Evaluation of Scientific Evidence Using Baysian Networks](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11454051_Evaluation_of_Scientific_Evidence_Using_Baysian_Networks)
|
||
- [Explaining Relevance](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-7908-1792-8_9)
|
||
- [The Scientification of Forensic Practice](https://philpapers.org/rec/GARTSO-15)
|
||
- [Historical Narratives, Evidence, and Explanations](https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_20)
|
||
- [The Bayes’ factor: the coherent measure for hypothesis confirmation](https://academic.oup.com/lpr/article/20/1/15/6485211)
|
||
- [Coherently updating degrees of belief: Radical Probabilism, the generalization of Bayes’ Theorem and its consequences on evidence evaluation](https://academic.oup.com/lpr/article/19/3-4/293/6269125)
|
||
- [Paolo Garbolino: Evidence and Probabilistic Explanations.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ye-TU6QRbPY)
|
||
12. [Barbara Osimani](https://philpeople.org/profiles/barbara-osimani)
|
||
- [Hunting Side Effects and Explaining Them: Should We Reverse Evidence Hierarchies Upside Down?](https://philpapers.org/rec/OSIHSE-2)
|
||
- [Until RCT proven? On the asymmetry of evidence requirements for risk assessment](https://philpapers.org/rec/OSIURO)
|
||
- [Barbara Osimani: Statistical Evidence in Strategic Environments](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X_NyFTYSEh8)
|
||
13. [Michael S Pardo](https://scholar.google.com.sg/citations?user=Idq6eFAAAAAJ&hl=th)
|
||
- [A Comment on Statistical Evidence and Standards of Proof](https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3364351)
|
||
- [Second Order Proof Rules](http://www.floridalawreview.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Pardo_BOOK.pdf)
|
||
- [Group Agency and Legal Proof; or, Why the Jury Is an “It"](https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol56/iss5/4/)
|
||
14. [Marina Gascón Abellán](https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Marina-Gascon-Abellan)
|
||
- [Marina Gascón: Scientific proof. A map of challenges.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9ngtB3x0Ao)
|
||
15. [Susan Haack: Proof, probability and Statistics: The Problem of "Delusive Exactness".](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBPbTKlIU8I)
|
||
16. [Susan Haack: Causation & Correlation: The Bradford Hill 'Criteria' in Epistemologial Context.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aA434dzgAI) |